ENTERPRISE DIVERSIFIED, INC. SYTE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1096934Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Jul 2007 to Apr 2011
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Vedder PriceFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- TROOP STEUBER PASICH REDDICK & TOBEY, LLPFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akerman LLP | Jan 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Vedder Price | Jan 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 144 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.94 |
| TROOP STEUBER PASICH REDDICK & TOBEY, LLP | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.55 | 1.41 | 1.74 |
| Alston & Bird | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Seward & Kissel | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward S. HortonSeward & KisselFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Ernest M. SternCulhane Meadows PLLCFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Andrew M. TuckerNelson MullinsFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Alan B. SpatzTroyGould PCFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 2.15× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Linda Giunta MichaelsonSheppard MullinFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Lindsay H. FergusonSheppard MullinFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Matthew W. MamakAlston & BirdFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward S. HortonSeward & Kissel | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 2.01 |
| Ernest M. SternCulhane Meadows PLLC | Jan 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.73 | 1.50 | 1.14 |
| Andrew M. TuckerNelson Mullins | Jan 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| Alan B. SpatzTroyGould PC | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.03 | 2.15 | 1.18 |
| Linda Giunta MichaelsonSheppard Mullin | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Lindsay H. FergusonSheppard Mullin | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Matthew W. MamakAlston & Bird | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 20 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 0.47 |