Trinsic, Inc. TRIN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1096509Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Foley & Lardner | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.98 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Holland & Knight | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 413 | 1.16 | 0.82 | 1.21 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gary A. BrooksCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 6.75× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Martin A. TraberFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- RANDALL C. BASSETTLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 5.55× · 95% wipeout 2.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary A. BrooksCahill Gordon & Reindel | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.90 | 6.75 | 1.34 |
| Martin A. TraberFoley & Lardner | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.50 | 2.27 | 1.35 |
| RANDALL C. BASSETTLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 5.55 | 2.11 |