ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS INC ANPMF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1096481Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Mar 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2004 to May 2011
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Irell & ManellaFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in a filing · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in a filing · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Herbert SmithFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Lionel Sawyer & CollinsFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 128 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irell & Manella | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 76 | 1.73 | 1.09 | 1.23 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Jul 2011 | Named in a filing | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Willkie Farr | Jul 2011 | Named in a filing | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 78 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Faegre & Benson | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Herbert Smith | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 90 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Lionel Sawyer & Collins | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 128 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 0.96 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.80 |
| Heller Ehrman | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alison S. ResslerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Kyle GuseHeller EhrmanFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Richard A. PeersHeller EhrmanFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison S. ResslerSullivan & Cromwell | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Kyle GuseHeller Ehrman | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Richard A. PeersHeller Ehrman | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 2.24 |