NUTRI SYSTEM INC NTRI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1096376Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked May 2012 · Named in a filing · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 414 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 1.27× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Reed SmithFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepper Hamilton | May 2012 | Named in a filing | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.11 |
| Morgan Lewis | Dec 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| Duane Morris | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 414 | 0.75 | 1.27 | 1.07 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Reed Smith | May 2005 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James W. McKenzie Jr.Morgan LewisFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.49×
- Paul J. JaskotReed SmithFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.76× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James W. McKenzie Jr.Morgan Lewis | Dec 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 2.49 |
| Paul J. JaskotReed Smith | May 2005 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 2.76 | 0.73 |