INTERSIL CORP/DE ISIL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1096325Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fenwick & West LLP | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Dechert LLP | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew J. SchultheisFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Robert A. FreedmanFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Douglas N. CogenFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.19×
- Christopher G. KarrasDechert LLPFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 2.67× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew J. SchultheisFenwick & West LLP | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| Robert A. FreedmanFenwick & West LLP | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 69 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 0.94 |
| Douglas N. CogenFenwick & West LLP | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.19 |
| Christopher G. KarrasDechert LLP | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.65 | 2.67 | 1.38 |