GENTIVA HEALTH SERVICES INC GTIV (last ticker on record)
CIK 1096142Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Nov 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- McKenna Long & AldridgeFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| McKenna Long & Aldridge | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 1.33 | 0.27 | 1.02 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Alston & Bird | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dennis J. BlockCadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in a filing · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Drew M. AltmanGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Raymond O. GietzWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Stacy S. IngramMcKenna Long & AldridgeFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas WardellMcKenna Long & AldridgeFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- JEFFREY J. WEINBERGWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 2.70× · 95% wipeout 2.43×
- Kenneth W. OrceCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Nicolas GrabarCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2015 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- David BrownMcKenna Long & AldridgeFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Ira N. RosnerGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Matthew D. BlochWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Sep 2007 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
- Helene R. BanksCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis J. BlockCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Jun 2014 | Named in a filing | 49 | 1.46 | 0.73 | 1.23 |
| Drew M. AltmanGreenberg Traurig | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 1.53 |
| Raymond O. GietzWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Aug 2009 | Named in a filing | 28 | 1.36 | 1.25 | 0.58 |
| Stacy S. IngramMcKenna Long & Aldridge | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Thomas WardellMcKenna Long & Aldridge | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 2.04 | 1.31 | 0.93 |
| JEFFREY J. WEINBERGWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.57 | 2.70 | 2.43 |
| Kenneth W. OrceCahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Nicolas GrabarCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2015 | Text search only | 37 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| David BrownMcKenna Long & Aldridge | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 10 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Ira N. RosnerGreenberg Traurig | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 24 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 1.10 |
| Matthew D. BlochWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Sep 2007 | Text search only | 33 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.36 |
| Helene R. BanksCahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2002 | Text search only | 9 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.25 |