DigitalFX International Inc DGFX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1095691Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Winstead PCFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 1.40 | 0.86 | 0.94 |
| Winstead PC | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 121 | 1.19 | 0.85 | 1.27 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greg AkselrudStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.57× · Went dark 1.44× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- BRUCE A. CHEATHAMWinstead PCFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- John J. McIlveryStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Scott GalerStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Scott AldertonTroop Meisinger Steuber & Pasich, LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg AkselrudStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.57 | 1.44 | 1.68 |
| BRUCE A. CHEATHAMWinstead PC | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| John J. McIlveryStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 23 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 0.51 |
| Scott GalerStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 12 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Scott AldertonTroop Meisinger Steuber & Pasich, LLP | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 0.55 |