TIGRENT INC TIGE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1095276Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Law Office of Gary A. AgronFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Law Office of Gary A. Agron | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 40 | 0.68 | 1.39 | 0.75 |
| Akerman LLP | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| HALE AND DORR | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Troy J. RilloK&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.98× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Gary A. AgronLaw Office of Gary A. AgronFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 1.71 | 0.37 | 0.90 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Troy J. RilloK&L Gates | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.52 | 1.98 | 0.57 |
| Gary A. AgronLaw Office of Gary A. Agron | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 43 | 0.64 | 1.35 | 0.99 |