WORKSTREAM INC WSTMF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1095266Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Nov 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | Nov 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.94 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| DLA Piper | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David LefkowitzWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Andrew D. ZeifDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.05×
- Larry P. LaubachCozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David LefkowitzWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| Andrew D. ZeifDLA Piper | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.05 |
| Larry P. LaubachCozen O'Connor P.C. | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.63 |