RETEK INC RETK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1094360Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre & Benson | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Davis Polk | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- A. Peter HarwichAllen & OveryFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael A. StanchfieldFaegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Steven C. KennedyFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 2.96× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Michael J. ColemanShearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher D. DillonShearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Martin A. WellingtonSidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.37×
- William M. KellyDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Peter HarwichAllen & Overy | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael A. StanchfieldFaegre Baker Daniels | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Steven C. KennedyFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.60 | 2.96 | 0.70 |
| Michael J. ColemanShearman & Sterling | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Christopher D. DillonShearman & Sterling | Sep 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Martin A. WellingtonSidley Austin | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 27 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 2.37 |
| William M. KellyDavis Polk | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 12 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.00 |