TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC TDY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1094285Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Apr 2026 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Apr 2026 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| K&L Gates | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hannah T. FrankMcGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Steven B. StokdykLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Marilyn W. DayFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.75×
- Scott E. WestwoodMcGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Ronald D. WestK&L GatesFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.39×
- Richard R. OroscoFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hannah T. FrankMcGuireWoods LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Steven B. StokdykLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 62 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Marilyn W. Day | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 2.75 |
| Scott E. WestwoodMcGuireWoods LLP | Jan 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.95 |
| Ronald D. WestK&L Gates | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 4.39 |
| Richard R. Orosco | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 0.73 |