STATS CHIPPAC, INC. CHPC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1093779Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Allen & GledhillFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.First linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Rajah & TannFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLPFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allen & Gledhill | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 64 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P. | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 145 | 1.23 | 1.02 | 0.87 |
| Norton Rose | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Sidley Austin | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Rajah & Tann | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 53 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 117 | 0.92 | 1.45 | 1.16 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael J. ColemanShearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stephen L. BurnsCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Eva H. DavisKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.95×
- Andrew C. FerreiraFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael W. SturrockLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Jacqueline R. ChackoFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Matthew D. BersaniShearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael J. ColemanShearman & Sterling | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Stephen L. BurnsCravath Swaine & Moore | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Eva H. DavisKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.95 |
| Andrew C. Ferreira | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael W. SturrockLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 18 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| Jacqueline R. Chacko | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Matthew D. BersaniShearman & Sterling | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 25 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.52 |