STONEPATH GROUP INC STG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1093546Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hodgson RussFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Buchanan Ingersoll Professional CorporationFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 123 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLPFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hodgson Russ | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 85 | 1.15 | 0.91 | 1.39 |
| Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 123 | 1.14 | 0.73 | 1.47 |
| Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 37 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 1.34 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian S. NorthBuchanan Ingersoll Professional CorporationFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.39× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 2.39×
- James J. BarnesReed SmithFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Joseph P. GaldaJ.P. Galda & Co.First linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 1.22× · 95% wipeout 2.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian S. NorthBuchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.39 | 0.88 | 2.39 |
| James J. BarnesReed Smith | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Joseph P. GaldaJ.P. Galda & Co. | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.14 | 1.22 | 2.05 |