ALLIANCE MEDICAL CORP
CIK 1092739Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Squire SandersFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snell & Wilmer | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 244 | 1.33 | 1.19 | 1.35 |
| Covington & Burling | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.97 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Squire Sanders | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 208 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel M. MahoneySnell & WilmerFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 1.57×
- Richard B. StaggSnell & WilmerFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert S. KantGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 2.08× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel M. MahoneySnell & Wilmer | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.25 | 2.05 | 1.57 |
| Richard B. StaggSnell & Wilmer | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert S. KantGreenberg Traurig | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 22 | 2.29 | 2.08 | 0.83 |