SPS COMMERCE INC SPSC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1092699Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 138 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 4.29× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Jan 2012 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 138 | 1.29 | 4.29 | 1.16 |
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Jan 2012 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Faegre & Benson | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Goodwin Procter | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Baker & Daniels | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christine G. LongFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and RiegeFirst linked Jan 2018 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Jonathan R. ZimmermanFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Kenneth J. GordonGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Mark J. MacenkaGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christine G. LongFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Mar 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and Riege | Jan 2018 | Named in a filing | 72 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Jonathan R. ZimmermanFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 1.45 | 0.55 | 1.56 |
| Kenneth J. GordonGoodwin Procter | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.18 | 1.09 | 0.41 |
| Mark J. MacenkaGoodwin Procter | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 2.64 |