CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC. CEMI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1092662Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2004 to Dec 2022
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- White & CaseFirst linked Apr 2023 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Lehman Walstrand & AssociatesFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 2.23× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
- Blume Law Firm, P.C.First linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Kaye ScholerFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- The Baum Law FirmFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.77× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White & Case | Apr 2023 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| K&L Gates | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Ballard Spahr | Apr 2015 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Haynes and Boone | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Patton Boggs | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Lehman Walstrand & Associates | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.00 | 2.23 | 1.88 |
| Blume Law Firm, P.C. | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.84 | 1.37 | 0.64 |
| Kaye Scholer | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 161 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| The Baum Law Firm | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 22 | 2.77 | 1.72 | 0.32 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James HuWhite & CaseFirst linked Apr 2023 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Julie F. RizzoK&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Sean M. JonesK&L GatesFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 4.65× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Mark L. JohnsonK&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.27× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Michael M. PritchardHaynes and BooneFirst linked Jan 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jeffrey P. RiedlerMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Melissa L. MongPatton BoggsFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- James MuchmorePatton BoggsFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Jon S. PloetzPatton BoggsFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Alan L. TalesnickPatton BoggsFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- David P. McLeanPatton BoggsFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Gary R. BlumeBlume Law Firm, P.C.First linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James HuWhite & Case | Apr 2023 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Julie F. RizzoK&L Gates | Feb 2023 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Sean M. JonesK&L Gates | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.98 | 4.65 | 1.11 |
| Mark L. JohnsonK&L Gates | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.19 | 1.27 | 1.53 |
| Michael M. PritchardHaynes and Boone | Jan 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jeffrey P. RiedlerMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Melissa L. MongPatton Boggs | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 1.10 |
| James MuchmorePatton Boggs | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 3.34 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Jon S. PloetzPatton Boggs | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| Alan L. TalesnickPatton Boggs | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.62 | 0.81 | 1.28 |
| David P. McLeanPatton Boggs | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Gary R. BlumeBlume Law Firm, P.C. | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.86 | 1.38 | 0.64 |
| Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin Naftalis | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 90 | 1.83 | 1.24 | 1.42 |