EMERGE INTERACTIVE INC EMRG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1092605Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton & Williams | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| Morgan Lewis | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Bryan Cave | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven J. FederPepper HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Gary E. ThompsonHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- MICHAEL J. PENDLETONJenkens & GilchristFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- JAMES A. OUNSWORTHFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- JAMES A. ULSH UIREMETTE, EVANS & WOODSIDEFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven J. FederPepper Hamilton | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Gary E. ThompsonHunton & Williams | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.58 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| MICHAEL J. PENDLETONJenkens & Gilchrist | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| JAMES A. OUNSWORTH | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| JAMES A. ULSH UIREMETTE, EVANS & WOODSIDE | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |