CMKM Diamonds, Inc. CMKX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1092299Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stoecklein Law GroupFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stoecklein Law Group | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.88 | 1.32 | 0.94 |
| Graubard Miller | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas C. CookThomas C. Cook Attorney at LawFirst linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Andrew D. HuddersGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 1.65× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas C. CookThomas C. Cook Attorney at Law | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 80 | 1.07 | 1.96 | 0.59 |
| Andrew D. HuddersGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 53 | 0.70 | 1.65 | 1.32 |