TRANSATLANTIC PETROLEUM LTD. TAT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1092289Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 2010 to Mar 2020
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Macleod DixonFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Holme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Jones DayFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked Sep 2008 · Text search only · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foley & Lardner | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Akin Gump | Oct 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Haynes and Boone | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Macleod Dixon | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.46 | 0.57 | 1.49 |
| Holme Roberts & Owen LLP | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 99 | 1.31 | 0.90 | 1.28 |
| Jones Day | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Porter & Hedges | Sep 2008 | Text search only | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garrett A. DeVriesAkin Gump | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 3.04 |