CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL INC CIR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1091883Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Sep 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2023 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2019 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Reinhart, Boerner, Van Deuren, Norris & Rieselbach, P.C.First linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2023 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Oct 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| HALE AND DORR | Mar 2018 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2018 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Goodwin Procter | Nov 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2019 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Reinhart, Boerner, Van Deuren, Norris & Rieselbach, P.C. | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 16 | 1.24 | 1.15 | 1.29 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Paul KinsellaRopes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Tara FisherRopes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Erika L. RobinsonWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Jonathan WolfmanWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Heidi SteeleMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jan 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- David A. CifrinoMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Andrew H. GoodmanGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.31×
- Suzanne D. LecarozGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Ann Beth StebbinsSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2019 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Oct 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Paul KinsellaRopes & Gray | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.70 | 0.39 | 0.66 |
| Tara FisherRopes & Gray | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Erika L. RobinsonWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2018 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Jonathan WolfmanWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2018 | Named in a filing | 18 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Heidi SteeleMcDermott Will & Emery | Jan 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| David A. CifrinoMcDermott Will & Emery | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Andrew H. GoodmanGoodwin Procter | Feb 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
| Suzanne D. LecarozGoodwin Procter | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Ann Beth StebbinsSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2019 | Text search only | 14 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |