ABB LTD ABBNY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1091587Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- White & CaseFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2020 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| White & Case | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arthur H. KohnCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Michael KimKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Thomas W. ChristopherKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
- Gregory PryorWhite & CaseFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur H. KohnCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 55 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| Michael KimKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 48 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Thomas W. ChristopherKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| Gregory PryorWhite & Case | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 0.84 |