MATERIALISE NV MTLS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1091223Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in a filing · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Burns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fenwick & West LLP | Aug 2021 | Named in a filing | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Clifford Chance US LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.85 |
| Paul Hastings | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Burns & Levinson LLP | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 35 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alejandro E. CamachoClifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 1.70× · 95% wipeout 1.97×
- William F. SchwitterPaul HastingsFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandro E. CamachoClifford Chance US LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.40 | 1.70 | 1.97 |
| William F. SchwitterPaul Hastings | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 24 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 1.21 |