GLOBAL DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIES INC
CIK 1090461Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Rutan & TuckerFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- de Castro P.C.First linked Feb 2009 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- J.M. Walker & AssociatesFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.67× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutan & Tucker | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 1.08 |
| de Castro P.C. | Feb 2009 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| J.M. Walker & Associates | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 73 | 1.51 | 1.67 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John T. BradleyRutan & TuckerFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- James DeOldenFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.98× · Went dark 2.07× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Jody M. WalkerJ.M. Walker & AssociatesFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- David GonzalezFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John T. BradleyRutan & Tucker | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| James DeOlden | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 10 | 3.98 | 2.07 | 1.17 |
| Jody M. WalkerJ.M. Walker & Associates | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 102 | 1.52 | 1.51 | 0.86 |
| David Gonzalez | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 91 | 1.34 | 1.69 | 0.76 |