CHEROKEE INTERNATIONAL CORP CHRK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1090069Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Armstrong TeasdaleFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Armstrong Teasdale | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 64 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul F. SheridanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Jennifer A. BenschWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Jeffrey H. CohenSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul F. SheridanLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2008 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Jennifer A. BenschWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 37 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| Jeffrey H. CohenSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.47 | 0.93 | 0.84 |