COMPLETEL EUROPE NV
CIK 1089558Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Holme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Holme Roberts & Owen LLP | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 99 | 1.31 | 0.90 | 1.23 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Mayer Brown | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
| Paul Hastings | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Francis R. WheelerCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 1999 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- W. Dean SalterHolme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francis R. WheelerCooley LLP | Sep 1999 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.28 | 1.18 | 0.78 |
| W. Dean SalterHolme Roberts & Owen LLP | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 1.43 |