HSBC HOLDINGS PLC HSBC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1089113Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 6-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Nov 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Norton Rose | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 305 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.22 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 199 | 0.80 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David I. GottliebCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Craig M. WassermanWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 148 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- Paul J. ShimCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Victor I. LewkowCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David I. GottliebCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Craig M. WassermanWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 33 | 1.49 | 1.05 | 0.62 |
| Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 148 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.42 |
| Paul J. ShimCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 45 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Victor I. LewkowCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 31 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 0.26 |