QUEST OIL CORP QOIL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1089104Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- The Baum Law FirmFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.77× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Stepp & Beauchamp LLPFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Baum Law Firm | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 22 | 2.77 | 1.72 | 0.32 |
| Stepp & Beauchamp LLP | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.00 | 1.10 | 0.75 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas E. Stepp Jr.Stepp Law GroupFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Barbara R. MittmanGrushko & MittmanFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 2.89× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas E. Stepp Jr.Stepp Law Group | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 110 | 0.67 | 1.40 | 0.79 |
| Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin Naftalis | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 90 | 1.83 | 1.24 | 1.42 |
| Barbara R. MittmanGrushko & Mittman | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 33 | 1.17 | 2.89 | 1.54 |