TIVO SOLUTIONS INC. TIVO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1088825Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Cooley LLP | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jon E. GavenmanCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Thomas J. IveySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.10×
- Kathleen M. WellsLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Keith BensonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Laura L. GabrielLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jon E. GavenmanCooley LLP | Sep 2016 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
| Thomas J. IveySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in a filing | 39 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 2.10 |
| Kathleen M. WellsLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 35 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Keith BensonLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Laura L. GabrielLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.35 |