ROME BANCORP INC ROME (last ticker on record)
CIK 1088144Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Silver, Freedman, Taff & Tiernan LLPFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
- [Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead]First linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 197 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.10× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Thacher Proffit & WoodFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Silver, Freedman, Taff & Tiernan LLP | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 190 | 0.27 | 0.39 | 0.34 |
| [Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead] | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 197 | 0.73 | 0.10 | 0.61 |
| Thacher Proffit & Wood | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Patton Boggs | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew Dyckman[Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead]First linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.27×
- V. Gerard Comizio[Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead]First linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Joseph G. Passaic Jr.Patton BoggsFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Dyckman[Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead] | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.27 |
| V. Gerard Comizio[Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead] | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Joseph G. Passaic Jr.Patton Boggs | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 13 | 1.19 | 1.20 | 1.08 |