PRO AFTER INC
CIK 1087831Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 350 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLPFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Dinsmore & ShohlFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 96 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 350 | 1.17 | 0.81 | 1.52 |
| Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 117 | 0.92 | 1.45 | 1.16 |
| Dinsmore & Shohl | May 2002 | Text search only | 96 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.64 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael S. KagnoffDLA PiperFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Thomas E. HornishWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.04×
- John L. DonahuePillsbury Madison & Sutro LLPFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 2.97× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Patrick J. DevinePerkins CoieFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael S. KagnoffDLA Piper | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Thomas E. HornishWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 11 | 4.08 | 0.00 | 2.04 |
| John L. DonahuePillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.64 | 2.97 | 1.70 |
| Patrick J. DevinePerkins Coie | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 0.93 |