BRIGHTCUBE INC
CIK 1086722Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 169 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Silicon Valley Law GroupFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 2.08× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Krieger & PragerFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 2.16× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 169 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 1.25 |
| Silicon Valley Law Group | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.98 | 2.08 | 1.44 |
| Krieger & Prager | May 2002 | Text search only | 38 | 0.90 | 2.16 | 1.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen A. WeissGreenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 3.24× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
- John C. KirklandDreier Stein & Kahan LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 2.93× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Cathryn S. GawneSilicon Valley Law GroupFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 2.53×
- James C. ChapmanSilicon Valley Law GroupFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.98× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen A. WeissGreenberg Traurig | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.87 | 3.24 | 1.92 |
| John C. KirklandDreier Stein & Kahan LLP | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.28 | 2.93 | 1.43 |
| Cathryn S. GawneSilicon Valley Law Group | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.61 | 1.72 | 2.53 |
| James C. ChapmanSilicon Valley Law Group | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.98 | 2.20 | 1.05 |