NET2PHONE INC NTOP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1086472Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 558 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDermott Will & Emery | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 558 | 0.98 | 0.61 | 1.10 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Dec 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Morrison & Foerster | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| Baker & Daniels | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.14 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.44 |
| Mayer Brown | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
| Piper Rudnick | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Dewey Ballantine | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew E. NagelKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stephen FraidinCadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Robert M. HaywardKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- James J. JunewiczWinston & StrawnFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Mark SelingerMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Allen L. WeingartenMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew E. NagelKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Stephen FraidinCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Robert M. HaywardKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| James J. JunewiczWinston & Strawn | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Mark SelingerMcDermott Will & Emery | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 32 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| Allen L. WeingartenMorrison & Foerster | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 0.00 |