AUDIOCODES LTD AUDC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1086434Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2026 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Naschitz, Brandes & Co., AdvocatesFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.77×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked May 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- White & CaseFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2026 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Norton Rose | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 305 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.22 |
| Naschitz, Brandes & Co., Advocates | Jun 2009 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.77 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | May 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| White & Case | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Julia A. ThompsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2026 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Aaron M. LampertNorton RoseFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Manuel G. RiveraNorton RoseFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Neil GoldFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked May 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 2.52× · 95% wipeout 1.57×
- Joshua G. KiernanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia A. ThompsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2026 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Aaron M. LampertNorton Rose | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Manuel G. RiveraNorton Rose | Aug 2013 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Neil GoldFulbright & Jaworski | May 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.50 | 2.52 | 1.57 |
| Joshua G. KiernanLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.26 |