AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES INC AKAM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1086222Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jan 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| HALE AND DORR | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Caroline DotoloWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Thomas S. WardHALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 3.46× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Stuart R. NaymanHALE AND DORRFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- John H. ChoryLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Susan W. MurleyHALE AND DORRFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline DotoloWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2022 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Thomas S. WardHALE AND DORR | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.47 | 3.46 | 1.49 |
| Stuart R. NaymanHALE AND DORR | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| John H. ChoryLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Susan W. MurleyHALE AND DORR | Aug 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.33 |