ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC ARTG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1086195Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Foley HoagFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Foley Hoag | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| HALE AND DORR | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Julia CowlesDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- John D. Patterson Jr.Foley HoagFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.45×
- Robert W. Sweet Jr.Foley HoagFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 1.94× · 95% wipeout 2.13×
- Mark L. JohnsonK&L GatesFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.27× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia CowlesDavis Polk | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 1.69 |
| John D. Patterson Jr.Foley Hoag | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| Robert W. Sweet Jr.Foley Hoag | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.87 | 1.94 | 2.13 |
| Mark L. JohnsonK&L Gates | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.19 | 1.27 | 1.53 |
| David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.16 |