MDU COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC MDTV (last ticker on record)
CIK 1086139Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Shughart, Thomson & Kilroy, P.C.First linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 2.11× · 95% wipeout 3.51×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in a filing · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Shughart, Thomson & Kilroy, P.C. | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.04 | 2.11 | 3.51 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Apr 2000 | Named in a filing | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | May 2002 | Text search only | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael R. LittenbergSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael R. LittenbergSchulte Roth & Zabel | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 52 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin Naftalis | May 2002 | Text search only | 90 | 1.83 | 1.24 | 1.42 |