DSL NET INC DSLN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1085866Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edwards Angell Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Day Berry & HowardFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 150 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.11×
- Edwards & AngellFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 81 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 76 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 1.38 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Day Berry & Howard | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 61 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 0.81 |
| Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 150 | 1.08 | 0.42 | 1.31 |
| Thibeault, LLP | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.11 |
| Edwards & Angell | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 81 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 1.15 |
| Palmer & Dodge | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 98 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew C. DallettLocke LordFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 2.61×
- David T. YoungGunderson DettmerFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.76× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Mark H. BurnettTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew C. DallettLocke Lord | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.11 | 1.45 | 2.61 |
| David T. YoungGunderson Dettmer | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.19 | 2.76 | 1.10 |
| Mark H. BurnettTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |