TWEEN BRANDS, INC. TWB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1085482Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Jul 2007 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLPFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proskauer Rose | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 67 | 0.63 | 0.54 | 1.07 |
| Davis Polk | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven L. KirshenbaumProskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Robert J. TannousPorter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLPFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.92× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Karen K. DreyfusO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven L. KirshenbaumProskauer Rose | Nov 2009 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.08 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Robert J. TannousPorter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.00 | 1.92 | 1.15 |
| Karen K. DreyfusO Melveny & Myers LLP | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 2.50 |