MUZAK HOLDINGS LLC
CIK 1085320Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- PEPE & HAZARDFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Heller Ehrman | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| PEPE & HAZARD | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 16 | 0.99 | 0.81 | 1.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian HechtKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Laurie T. GuntherKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- STEPHEN H. COOPERWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 3.07× · 95% wipeout 3.67×
- John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- John PapachristosCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian HechtKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Laurie T. GuntherKirkland & Ellis | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| STEPHEN H. COOPERWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.01 | 3.07 | 3.67 |
| John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 36 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| John PapachristosCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 7 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 1.48 |