HII Technologies, Inc. HIIT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1085254Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Sep 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Indeglia & Carney, P.C.First linked Sep 2011 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Spectrum Law Group, LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Gardere Wynne Sewell LLPFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Doerner Saunders Daniel & AndersonFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 5.47× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLPFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indeglia & Carney, P.C. | Sep 2011 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.85 | 1.66 | 0.85 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Spectrum Law Group, LLP | May 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.99 | 1.05 | 0.97 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 117 | 1.13 | 0.97 | 1.24 |
| Doerner Saunders Daniel & Anderson | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 6 | 1.71 | 5.47 | 0.00 |
| Haynes and Boone | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 91 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greg CarneySheppard MullinFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.46× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Jody R. SamuelsRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.09× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Mary Ann SaponeRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 2.18× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Marc A. IndegliaIndeglia & Carney, P.C.First linked May 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg CarneySheppard Mullin | Sep 2011 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.41 | 0.46 | 1.19 |
| Jody R. SamuelsRichardson & Patel LLP | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 2.09 | 1.37 | 1.07 |
| Mary Ann SaponeRichardson & Patel LLP | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 2.36 | 2.18 | 1.61 |
| Marc A. IndegliaIndeglia & Carney, P.C. | May 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.46 | 1.81 | 1.10 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |