ARIBA INC ARBA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1084755Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- VILLENEUVE FRANKLIN & HACHIGANFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VILLENEUVE FRANKLIN & HACHIGAN | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 5 | 3.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| DLA Piper | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Apr 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DANIEL R. MITZWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Christopher D. DillonShearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Brooks StoughGunderson DettmerFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.76×
- Craig M. SchmitzGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 3.35× · 95% wipeout 2.18×
- GRAY CARY WARE FREIDENRICHDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DANIEL R. MITZWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.88 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Christopher D. DillonShearman & Sterling | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Brooks StoughGunderson Dettmer | Apr 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 1.76 |
| Craig M. SchmitzGoodwin Procter | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.41 | 3.35 | 2.18 |
| GRAY CARY WARE FREIDENRICHDLA Piper | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 24 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 1.47 |