XZERES Corp. XPWR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1084597Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Cane Clark LLPFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Tenzer Greenblatt LLPFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 2.64× · 95% wipeout 3.54×
- Watson Farley & WilliamsFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Cane Clark LLP | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.25 | 1.17 | 0.97 |
| Tenzer Greenblatt LLP | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 30 | 1.72 | 2.64 | 3.54 |
| Watson Farley & Williams | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 93 | 0.59 | 0.32 | 1.37 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Rory VohwinkelFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Bryan R. ClarkCane Clark LLPFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Scott DoneyThe Doney Law FirmFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 1.87 | 1.30 | 1.41 |
| Rory Vohwinkel | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Bryan R. ClarkCane Clark LLP | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 77 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 1.22 |
| Scott DoneyThe Doney Law Firm | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 121 | 1.04 | 1.39 | 0.86 |