360NETWORKS INC
CIK 1084587Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Farris Vaughan Wills & MurphyFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.34 |
| Farris Vaughan Wills & Murphy | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.60 | 1.47 | 0.95 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael McArthur-PhillipsDavis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.78× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Roger AndrusCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael McArthur-PhillipsDavis Wright Tremaine LLP | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.56 | 1.78 | 0.95 |
| Roger AndrusCahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.63 |