RSTAR CORP RSTRC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1084561Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2000
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Nov 1999 to Aug 2002
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 1999 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Jeffer MangelsFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 2.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Piper Rudnick | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Arnold & Porter | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 1999 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Jeffer Mangels | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 45 | 0.52 | 1.35 | 2.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jonathan KleinDLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.12×
- JOSEPH F. DANIELSLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Steven G. TepperArnold & PorterFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- MARK A. BERTELSENWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan KleinDLA Piper | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.12 |
| JOSEPH F. DANIELSLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.42 | 0.00 | 1.59 |
| Steven G. TepperArnold & Porter | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| MARK A. BERTELSENWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 1.74 |