PARETEUM Corp TEUM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1084384Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Oct 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2019 to Dec 2021
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Martin & Pritchett, P.A.First linked Jul 2006 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.89× · Went dark 1.46× · 95% wipeout 2.90×
- Bird & BirdFirst linked Sep 2017 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Libertas Law GroupFirst linked Oct 2016 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.01× · Went dark 2.19× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Gregory BartkoFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.57×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Martin & Pritchett, P.A. | Jul 2006 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.89 | 1.46 | 2.90 |
| Bird & Bird | Sep 2017 | Text search only | 46 | 1.82 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Libertas Law Group | Oct 2016 | Text search only | 9 | 3.01 | 2.19 | 1.62 |
| Gregory Bartko | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 10 | 2.72 | 0.00 | 1.57 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Darrin M. OcasioSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Steven E. SiesserLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Sarah E. WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 1.90× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
- David SelengutEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 1.80× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
- Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 187 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Harold H. MartinMartin & Pritchett, P.A.First linked Jul 2006 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.54× · Went dark 1.74× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- GREGORY BARTKOGregory BartkoFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.68× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Richard D. SurberFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.84× · Went dark 1.88× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darrin M. OcasioSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 143 | 1.16 | 1.72 | 1.16 |
| Steven E. SiesserLowenstein Sandler | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.08 | 0.62 | 1.10 |
| Sarah E. WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 0.72 | 1.81 | 1.02 |
| Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 49 | 1.71 | 1.90 | 1.66 |
| David SelengutEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.41 | 1.80 | 1.99 |
| Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 187 | 0.98 | 1.25 | 1.32 |
| Harold H. MartinMartin & Pritchett, P.A. | Jul 2006 | Named in a filing | 30 | 2.54 | 1.74 | 1.31 |
| GREGORY BARTKOGregory Bartko | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 14 | 2.68 | 0.42 | 1.29 |
| Richard D. Surber | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.84 | 1.88 | 1.07 |