ZIFF DAVIS, INC. ZD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1084048Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Sep 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2012 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proskauer Rose | Sep 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.05 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Apr 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2012 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kristina TraugerShearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Louis RamboProskauer RoseFirst linked Sep 2023 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 25.51× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Patrick S. BrownSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Frank H. Golay Jr.Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina TraugerShearman & Sterling | Aug 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Louis RamboProskauer Rose | Sep 2023 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.92 | 25.51 | 1.12 |
| Patrick S. BrownSullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Frank H. Golay Jr.Sullivan & Cromwell | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.90 |