INTREPID TECHNOLOGY & RESOURCES, INC. ITRP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1083742Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- HAWLEY TROXELL ENNIS & HAWLEYFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Chapman and CutlerFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAWLEY TROXELL ENNIS & HAWLEY | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.86 | 1.33 | 1.53 |
| Duane Morris | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| K&L Gates | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Chapman and Cutler | May 2007 | Text search only | 95 | 1.17 | 0.32 | 0.93 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | May 2007 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael D. SchwammDuane MorrisFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.07× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- Ronald S. HaligmanK&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Jacqueline G. HodesK&L GatesFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 2.43× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael D. SchwammDuane Morris | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 2.07 | 0.42 |
| Ronald S. HaligmanK&L Gates | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.77 | 1.66 | 1.10 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Jacqueline G. HodesK&L Gates | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.18 | 2.43 | 1.19 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |