I/OMAGIC CORP IOMG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1083663Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Luce Forward Hamilton & ScrippsFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Rutan & TuckerFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Horwitz & BeamFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- SENN PALUMBO MEULEMANSFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.22× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 80 | 0.85 | 1.20 | 0.90 |
| Rutan & Tucker | Jun 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 1.08 |
| Horwitz & Beam | Apr 2000 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.24 | 0.97 | 0.47 |
| SENN PALUMBO MEULEMANS | May 2004 | Text search only | 9 | 1.06 | 1.22 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John T. BradleyRutan & TuckerFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Larry A. CeruttiRutan & TuckerFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
- Lawrence W. HorwitzHorwitz & BeamFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John T. BradleyRutan & Tucker | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| Larry A. CeruttiRutan & Tucker | Jun 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.43 | 0.77 | 1.78 |
| Lawrence W. HorwitzHorwitz & Beam | Apr 2000 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.25 | 1.20 | 1.67 |