MIV THERAPEUTICS INC MIVI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1083011Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lang Michener LLPFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Bullivant Houser Bailey PCFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Stepp Law GroupFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lang Michener LLP | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 90 | 1.14 | 1.17 | 1.01 |
| Bullivant Houser Bailey PC | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Stepp Law Group | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 103 | 0.81 | 1.47 | 0.73 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Herbert Herb I. OnoLang Michener LLPFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 2.48× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- Thomas J. DeutschLang Michener LLPFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.75× · Went dark 2.08× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Daniel B. EngLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Thomas A. BraunFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.22× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas E. Stepp Jr.Stepp Law GroupFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Herbert I. OnoLang Michener LLPFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.79× · 95% wipeout 1.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herbert Herb I. OnoLang Michener LLP | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.70 | 2.48 | 1.60 |
| Thomas J. DeutschLang Michener LLP | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.75 | 2.08 | 0.52 |
| Daniel B. EngLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.38 | 1.41 | 1.19 |
| Thomas A. Braun | Oct 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 1.22 | 0.00 |
| Thomas E. Stepp Jr.Stepp Law Group | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 110 | 0.67 | 1.40 | 0.79 |
| Herbert I. OnoLang Michener LLP | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 20 | 0.95 | 1.79 | 1.76 |