TEAM HEALTH HOLDINGS INC. TMH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1082754Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Epstein Becker & GreenFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2017 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Epstein Becker & Green | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 115 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Michael KimKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in a filing · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Ryan BekkerusSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- William R. DoughertySimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2017 | Named in a filing | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Michael KimKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2017 | Named in a filing | 48 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Ryan BekkerusSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 14 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 1.63 |
| William R. DoughertySimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 20 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 1.11 |